The case against “virology” and the idea of “viruses”

In order to deal with the topic of “virology” and the existence of “viruses” we first need to answer the simple question, how do we prove the existence of a “virus”?

So how do we do it then, how do we prove the existence of a “virus”? Well how do we prove that a specific animal exists? We first have to find the animal in nature and then isolate it (meaning separating the animal from everything else) where we can then characterize it, only then can we ensure that we know its length, height, width and its genetic makeup. Unless we do this basic step we are simply working under an assumption that the animal exists and not scientific evidence. When it comes to a “virus” then we would have to take a sample directly from a person and isolate it(separate it from everything else) BEFORE any experiment with cell cultures or animals.

full article